Dr. John Leonard On the Importance of Clinical Trials

Recently, Dr. John Leonard sat down with Reuters to discuss what all cancer patients, not just lymphoma patients should know about clinical trials at Weill Cornell Medicine.

He answered four questions:

What are the benefits of clinical trials?
What risks do clinical trials pose?
Who pays for clinical trials?
Why are clinical trials so important?

Watch Dr. Leonard’s full explanation at this link: “How can you help cure cancer”

johnvidgrab

Immunotherapy Targeting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor with Durvalumab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma or CLL

Picture2By Jia Ruan, M.D., Ph.D.

A functional immune system is vital to control the growth of many types of cancers. Tumors can grow when tumor cells evade the immune system by modulating the tumor microenvironment through expression of inhibitory molecules such as PD-1 and PD-L1. Interaction of PD-1 receptor on T-cells with its ligand PD-L1 on tumor cells leads to T-cell exhaustion, immune dysfunction, and tumor progression. Recently therapeutic targeting of inhibitory checkpoint molecules like PD-1 and PD-L1 have shown promise as effective immunotherapy across a number of tumor types including solid tumors and lymphomas. These immunotherapies work by augmenting the patient’s immune system. The first generation of these new inhibitors include anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which have gained FDA approval for the treatment of melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer.

Durvalumab, also known as MEDI4736, is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1к monoclonal antibody (mAb) that selectively binds to human PD-L1 with high affinity and blocks its ability to bind to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor on the T-cells. As a PD-L1 inhibitor, durvalumab activates the tumor-infiltrating T-cells, allowing them to destroy the tumor cells. Essentially durvalumab acts a catalyst to reactivate the body’s immune system and destroy cancerous tumor cells.

Clinical Trial Summary 

Weill Cornell Medicine has recently opened a clinical trial for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma or released/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) previously treated with at least one systemic therapy. The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1, in combination with other specific anti-lymphoma therapies, including lenalidomide plus rituximab, ibrutinib, and bendamustine plus rituximab.

The study will consist of 3 parts: dose finding, dose confirmation, and dose expansion.  Four treatment arms will be investigated:

-Arm A (durvalumab plus lenalidomide and rituximab);

-Arm B (durvalumab plus ibrutinib);

-Arm C (durvalumab plus bendamustine and rituximab);

-Arm D (durvalumab monotherapy).

Study subjects will receive treatment for approximately one year and be in follow-up for anywhere from two to five years after treatment.

Can PET-CT Scans be used to Guide the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma?

Lisa Roth, MD
Lisa Roth, MD

By Lisa Roth, MD

The New England Journal of Medicine recently published results from a study where researchers used positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans to guide treatment for patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma. The chemotherapy used to treat Hodgkin lymphoma can be associated with long-term health risks including toxicity in the lungs as a result of the chemotherapy agent bleomycin. Decreasing the risk of long-term toxicity is especially important in Hodgkin lymphoma where the majority of patients will be cured of their disease and their long term quality of life heavily factors into treatment decisions.

In this study patients were treated with 2 cycles of the chemotherapy regimen ABVD, which includes bleomycin. After 2 cycles of ABVD patients underwent a PET-CT scan. Patients who had a positive PET scan received more intensive therapy with the BEACOPP chemotherapy regimen. Patients who had a negative PET-CT were randomly assigned to continue treatment with ABVD or receive AVD, which does not include bleomycin. The outcomes of the ABVD and AVD groups were compared.

A total of 1,214 patients enrolled in this trial and the majority (83.7%) had a negative PET-CT after two cycles of ABVD. The statistical analysis comparing the group receiving ABVD with the group receiving AVD was designed to determine if AVD was not inferior to ABVD non-inferiority. Although the data fell just short of demonstrating non-inferiority, the difference in outcome between the AVD and ABVD groups was minimal (1.6%). Importantly, the risk of lung toxicity was higher in the group of patients who continued to receive ABVD.

This data suggests that omitting bleomycin in the treatment of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, who have a negative PET-CT after 2 cycles of ABVD, decreases the risk of lung toxicity without significantly increasing the risk of relapse.