Ibrutinib—A New Standard Treatment for Mantle Cell Lymphoma?

In The Lancet, Dr. Peter Martin commented on the results of a recently completed phase 3 trial in Europe that compared ibrutinib to temsirolimus among patients with mantle cell lymphoma. He writes that the results of the study clearly establish, “…ibrutinib as a new standard for treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.” Dr. Martin’s full comments on the topic can be found in the attached PDF below:

Ibrutinib-a new standard treatment for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma?

A full listing of currently available clinical trials for mantle cell lymphoma can be found on the Joint Clinical Trials website.

Dr. Peter Martin Describes a Copanlisib Trial for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients who have Previously Failed Ibrutinib Treatment

In this video Dr. Peter Martin describes the benefits of a recently opened clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of copanlisib for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients, who have failed or were unable to tolerate ibrutinib treatment. The purpose of this study is to to evaluate the efficacy and safety of copanlisib monotherapy in patients with MCL.

If you’re interested in participating in this trial please call 212-746-2919 for more information. A full listing of MCL trials at Weill Cornell Medicine can be found here.

Q & A with Dr. Peter Martin on High Dose Cytarabine for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients

In a recent interview with Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology, Dr. Peter Martin answered questions about the use of high dose cytarabine for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

H&O How much does high-dose cytarabine improve patient outcome?

PM I do not think that has been very well defined. Not all of these data have sufficient long-term follow-up to comment on overall survival outcomes. Historically, patients were given R-CHOP followed by ASCT. The MCL-2 trial, published by Geisler and colleagues, added high-dose cytarabine and rituximab, and found that the outcomes were far superior in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival. However, these outcomes may not be solely due to high-dose cytarabine. Other explanations include the addition of rituximab, other changes in supportive care, and better pathology. Cytarabine may be part of that story, but it may not be the whole story.

The better trial to evaluate the potential role of cytarabine is the MCL Younger Trial that I mentioned earlier, which is a phase 3 trial published by Hermine and colleagues that compared 6 cycles of R-CHOP vs the R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen. In this trial, the addition of R-DHAP seemed to reduce the risk of disease progression by approximately 30%. The study also found that the R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen prepared people for ASCT better than R-CHOP alone.

A transcript of the full interview can be read here.